will
|
Interestingly, the connector on the simple Decware silver reference is pretty minimal. Very simple, light weight silver pin and partial ring. So if the Xshadows are that much better, it makes me wonder about the theory of minimalism with ICs.
JD,
Can you describe the sonic improvement with the Xshadows. Your comment makes me think about doing it. I have some Eichmann Bullets around too.
I have found that everything matters...metal, purity, gauge, insulation, connectors, solder...even the direction with a lot of cables. And though I get it conceptually, I don't think purist approaches always work best. If a certain copper wire sounds better with pure silver bananas than with pure copper spades, it may be just what is needed to get the most from that particular copper wire and configuration.
BTW, has anyone cleaned their cable connectors lately? I am always amazed when I remember. I just cleaned my Decware ICs and even though corrosion of silver is supposed to be a good conductor, I think they sound better, less there.
So far I prefer silver ICs, so I will compare a few.
Comparing simple Decware SRs with Grovers...the Grovers have custom designed non-resonant, low noise silver connectors. I think both ICs are nice resolving cables if their signature fits your needs. The silver Reference remind me of some classic tubes many like....tending to some emphasis in the upper and lower ranges....exceptionally sparkly uppermids ("crisp and clear" comments...) and deep bass that can go to "soft" if you have low bass issues. Siemens/RTF El34s, also very resolving, come to mind as having similar emphasis. It is not that the mid-mids are receded, just that the upper mids and bass seem a little pronounced in the balance. With a lot of tube sets, RCA grey labeled OA3s have this same tendency compared to other OA3s if you are familiar with them. Here the Decware silvers are similar...They are nice and smooth, and even warmish everywhere but the upper mids up, but it seems the slight tonal emphasis probably defines most of the sound...not bad or good...just the way I hear them.
The balance of the Grovers by comparison, make the mid-midrange more pronounced, causing a sense of less bass and upper end emphasis though all the detail and bass is there. They feel like they are a little warmer overall due the upper mids being softer in the blend. They are a little more forward in general (bigger wire?), to me just a bit overly pushed...but I think they have very nice frequency balance and resolution. And they probably have a little less noise, feeling more space and pace with them, though this could be more frequency balance, by comparison, the bass of the Decwares masking some of the mids???? Grovers are very revealing across the spectrum, though I would not say particularly bright.
I think my favs are VHaudio silver recipe with low mass KLE silver harmony connectors. Compared to the Grovers, these cables have a little less push and volume (though about the same as Decware). They are both fast, but the VH are smoother and warmer, making them appear perhaps a touch less resolving....but I don't think this is the case...I think they are just smoother, with natural analog timbre and lucidity. I can't hear balance emphasis with them...they seem even to me. And if you flip them, one way is a little warmer/darker, ....so if anyone makes them, it is good to be sure to run the wire the same way on both and mark the beginning end on each. The parts (connectors from partsconnexion and the rest from VHaudio) cost a little more than the Decware and Grovers, and you have to make them, and there is not return like the others..... But to me, in this system...they support a sense of "analog" resolution...very resolving, but smooth and warmish...pretty much disappearing...
I think they are all really nice cables, but these are thoughts on what I hear in my system/room by comparison.
|